@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {McTaggart,J.E.M.}, subject = {Causality}, note = {Geach I 41 Causality/explanation/McTaggart: his formulation "in view of" instead of "because": is not causal. N.B./Geach: because of the missing causality something can also be mistakenly considered an X by someone even if it is not X! The (false) believe is then the cause of the attribution. I 41/42 N.B.: now I do not admire someone in relation to my own believe! Surely gods would have no false belief, but we can nevertheless make this distinction: The gods love something in terms of being pious, and not in relation to one's own attitude to it. But one must distinguish exactly: the attitude is already the reason (causally!) But it does not provide the property (characteristic) in relation to which it is loved. >Quine on "views".}, note = { Gea I P.T. Geach Logic Matters Oxford 1972 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=446300} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=446300} }