@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Peacocke,Christopher}, subject = {Understanding}, note = {II 182 Understanding/compositionality/Peacocke: E.g. A single Russian phrase has been translated, so that we know "what Breschniev has said". - We do not understand this sentence, because we could not use the Russian words that we could perhaps not assign one-to-one to form Russian phrases ourselves - knowledge of what has been said, is not enough. >Translation, >Vocabulary, >Sentences. Compositionality: for conjunctions of sentences, we assume that if A & B are uttered, the speaker believes that q and that r - and it are common knowledge that the listener believes that the speaker ... etc. >Compositionality. For negation: that the speaker does not believe that p ... - in each case complete sentences that are bound in compound sentences. >Negation, >Language use, >Language behavior, >Meaning, >Sense. I 198 Thought/belief/understanding/Peacocke: if someone understands a sentence, it is ambiguous what thoughts he expresses with it (underdetermined). >Propositions, >Thoughts, >Beliefs. The language is not rich enough - only the object is picked, not the intension. >Intension, >Identification, >Objects.}, note = { Peacocke I Chr. R. Peacocke Sense and Content Oxford 1983 Peacocke II Christopher Peacocke "Truth Definitions and Actual Languges" In Truth and Meaning, G. Evans/J. McDowell, Oxford 1976 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=281110} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=281110} }