@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Tugendhat, E.}, subject = {Singular Terms}, note = {I 102 Singular Term/Tugendhat: we need it because we cannot imagine object, but we mean them. >Meaning (Intending). VsRepresentation - instead: propositional content. >Representation, >Propositional content. I 338f Singular Term/Tugendhat: difference to predicate: we cannot say analogously, the singular term 'a' stands for those object that if the predicate 'F' applies to it, the assertion 'Fa' becomes true. >Truthmakers. I 338 Then the object "a" would be the indistinguishable of all other objects to which the predicate 'F' also applies. Singular terms form equivalence classes. >Equivalence classes. I 414 Singular Term/Tugendhat: can stand for 4 types of objects: 1. demonstrative expressions: "this mountain" 2. description with location 3. other clear relation E.g. "the murderer of Schmidt" (not perception but relative feature) 4. by a single characteristic: E.g. "the highest mountain".}, note = { Tu I E. Tugendhat Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976 Tu II E. Tugendhat Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=267480} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=267480} }