@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Nagel,Thomas}, subject = {Propositional Knowledge}, note = {I 19 ~ Nagel: not for each state propositional knowledge available. - Kripke ditto, always cogito certainly while interpretative sentrences can be wrong. >Explanation. No subjective component in propositions. I 134 propositional knowledge/Nagel: (linguistic knowledge). - E.g. knowledge what it is like to see is no propositional knowledge. A blind person can not be teached. >Knowing how. But also not a seeing person! It is a knowledge that can affect in any way. Contrary to that: knowledge how: e.g. looks like a certain face. >Recognition, >Knowledge.}, note = { NagE I E. Nagel The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation Cambridge, MA 1979 Nagel I Th. Nagel The Last Word, New York/Oxford 1997 German Edition: Das letzte Wort Stuttgart 1999 Nagel II Thomas Nagel What Does It All Mean? Oxford 1987 German Edition: Was bedeutet das alles? Stuttgart 1990 Nagel III Thomas Nagel The Limits of Objectivity. The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, in: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 1980 Vol. I (ed) St. M. McMurrin, Salt Lake City 1980 German Edition: Die Grenzen der Objektivität Stuttgart 1991 NagelEr I Ernest Nagel Teleology Revisited and Other Essays in the Philosophy and History of Science New York 1982 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=257576} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=257576} }