@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Armstrong,David M.}, subject = {Forces}, note = {III 122 Forces/physics/ontology/Armstrong: forces would be non-categorical universals along with categorical and particulars - too complex ontology. Armstrong: also you still need relations - also a relation between force and its actualization. ArmstrongVsTorces. >Relations/Armstrong. - - - II (d) 152 Force/Armstrong: Forces point "behind themselves".}, note = { Armstrong I David M. Armstrong Meaning and Communication, The Philosophical Review 80, 1971, pp. 427-447 In Handlung, Kommunikation, Bedeutung, Georg Meggle, Frankfurt/M. 1979 Armstrong II (a) David M. Armstrong Dispositions as Categorical States In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Armstrong II (b) David M. Armstrong Place’ s and Armstrong’ s Views Compared and Contrasted In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Armstrong II (c) David M. Armstrong Reply to Martin In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Armstrong II (d) David M. Armstrong Second Reply to Martin London New York 1996 Armstrong III D. Armstrong What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=242314} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=242314} }