@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Tugendhat, E.}, subject = {Conjunction}, note = {I 296 And/sign/mention/use/Tugendhat: "A and B": on the side of the sign, we do not have to expect the term "p and q", but the expression ’that p and that q". This is an analogy, in fact. Moreover it is in need of a completion by a predicate. >Logical connectives, >Levels, >Logical constants, >That-clauses, >States of affairs. I 297 but the state of affairs that p and the st.o.a. that q are not composed - we need a more general term, that somehow contains composition, but goes beyond it. I 297 Conjunction/Tugendhat: "and" is not connecting objects nor states of affairs - it combines nothing at all. Cf. >Compositionality, >Complexes.}, note = { Tu I E. Tugendhat Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976 Tu II E. Tugendhat Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=240064} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=240064} }