@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Armstrong,David M.}, subject = {Causality}, note = {III 95 Causality/Armstrong: one may not identify causation with (natural) necessity. - There are cases of necessity, which are not cases of causation. - Hence we should not identify causal laws with natural laws. II 25 Causality/Place: is a modal relation. - between times: a categorical relation. >Natural laws, >Causation, >Laws, >Necessity, >Causal laws, >Modalities, >Categoricalness.}, note = { Armstrong I David M. Armstrong Meaning and Communication, The Philosophical Review 80, 1971, pp. 427-447 In Handlung, Kommunikation, Bedeutung, Georg Meggle, Frankfurt/M. 1979 Armstrong II (a) David M. Armstrong Dispositions as Categorical States In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Armstrong II (b) David M. Armstrong Place’ s and Armstrong’ s Views Compared and Contrasted In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Armstrong II (c) David M. Armstrong Reply to Martin In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Armstrong II (d) David M. Armstrong Second Reply to Martin London New York 1996 Armstrong III D. Armstrong What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=237763} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=237763} }