@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {McDowell,John}, subject = {Interpretation}, note = {I 180 Radical interpretation/Davidson/McDowell: ultimately, the field linguist picks up norms from the inner perspective (language, coherence, not ratio stimulus/world). >Radical interpretation, >Understanding/McDowell, >Idiolect, >Language behavior. I 181 McDowellVsRorty: if he forbids a normative view for the field linguist (and thus proposes an external perspective of a purely causal nature), then he deprives us of the importance of the transition from the initial predicament to the achieved interpretation. I 182 McDowellVsRorty: ultimately represents a dualism of nature and reason. Therefore, as a pragmatist, he can only be successful in some cases. He himself does not see this as a dualism. He speaks of it (Rorty): "patiently explaining that norms are something different than descriptions." >New description/Rorty, >Norm/McDowell, >Dualism.}, note = { McDowell I John McDowell Mind and World, Cambridge/MA 1996 German Edition: Geist und Welt Frankfurt 2001 McDowell II John McDowell "Truth Conditions, Bivalence and Verificationism" In Truth and Meaning, G. Evans/J. McDowell, }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=235484} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=235484} }