@misc{Lexicon of Arguments,
title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024},
author = {Chisholm,Roderick},
subject = {Intentionality},
note = {I 15
Chisholm thesis: primacy of intentionality before language. Cf. >Thought and language.
- - -
II 115
Intentionality/Brandl: that does not explain the attributive use ("Whoever it is") - instead use is explained by our knowledge of the language, therefore the primacy of intentionality is questionable.
Brandl, Johannes. Gegen den Primat des Intentionalen. In: M.David/L. Stubenberg (Hg) Philosophische Aufsätze zu Ehren von R.M. Chisholm Graz 1986
- - -
II 218
Primacy of the intentional/Chisholm: to understand the reference of language by the reference of thinking. >Reference.
Wittgenstein: Vs, but not unique.
II 219
Linguistic turn: only shifts the problem.
Intentionality/Wittgenstein: Wittgenstein has such aspects in his thinking, too.
Marek, Johann Christian. Zum Programm einer Deskriptiven Psychologie. In: Philosophische Ausätze zu Ehren Roderick M. Chisholm Marian David/ Leopold Stubenberg (Hg), Amsterdam 1986},
note = { Chisholm I R. Chisholm The First Person. Theory of Reference and Intentionality, Minneapolis 1981 German Edition: Die erste Person Frankfurt 1992 Chisholm II Roderick Chisholm In Philosophische Aufsäze zu Ehren von Roderick M. Ch, Marian David/Leopold Stubenberg, Amsterdam 1986 Chisholm III Roderick M. Chisholm Theory of knowledge, Englewood Cliffs 1989 German Edition: Erkenntnistheorie Graz 2004
},
file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=235002}
url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=235002}
}