@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Brandom,Robert}, subject = {I, Ego, Self}, note = {I 645 I/You/Brandom: is systematically, not anaphorically linked - one often takes the place of the other. I 646 "It" cannot always be used symmetrically: E.g. Hegel understood Kant's argument, but he has not refuted it - but it is not the actual tokening he has refuted - he has never heard of this tokening. I 766f I/Brandom: is not replaceable, because with any other expression [t] circumstances are conceivable that t has a certain proposition, and not me - e.g. >sugar trail example. I 767 Difference "I will" - "t should" - N.B.: I/Brandom: cannot only be used to assign a definition. I 770 Anscombe: no room for the question who is the one that I know this from (namely me). I 779 No one else can utter the phrase "I'm being threatened by a bear", but everyone can understand it., >Reference, >Self-reference, >Self-knowledge, >Individuation, >Self-identification, >Self-ascription, >Self.}, note = { Bra I R. Brandom Making it exlicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge/MA 1994 German Edition: Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000 Bra II R. Brandom Articulating reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge/MA 2001 German Edition: Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=230224} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=230224} }