@misc{Lexicon of Arguments,
title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024},
author = {Brandom,Robert},
subject = {I, Ego, Self},
note = {I 645
I/You/Brandom: is systematically, not anaphorically linked - one often takes the place of the other.
I 646
"It" cannot always be used symmetrically: E.g. Hegel understood Kant's argument, but he has not refuted it - but it is not the actual tokening he has refuted - he has never heard of this tokening.
I 766f
I/Brandom: is not replaceable, because with any other expression [t] circumstances are conceivable that t has a certain proposition, and not me - e.g. >sugar trail example.
I 767
Difference "I will" - "t should" - N.B.: I/Brandom: cannot only be used to assign a definition.
I 770
Anscombe: no room for the question who is the one that I know this from (namely me).
I 779
No one else can utter the phrase "I'm being threatened by a bear", but everyone can understand it., >Reference, >Self-reference, >Self-knowledge, >Individuation, >Self-identification, >Self-ascription, >Self.},
note = { Bra I R. Brandom Making it exlicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge/MA 1994 German Edition: Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000 Bra II R. Brandom Articulating reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge/MA 2001 German Edition: Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001
},
file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=230224}
url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=230224}
}