@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Goodman,Nelson}, subject = {Forgeries}, note = {III 43 Even with trompe l'oeuil the probability rarely rises above zero, because to see a picture as a picture, excludes, to mistake it for something else. >Deceptions, >Seeing, >Art. III 103 No one can determine by mere looking at the pictures that no one has ever been able or will be able to tell them apart by mere looking at them. III 103 If you set the difference beyond the what is perceptible by mere looking at them, one admits that anything beyond this range constitutes a difference. III 105 And the fact, that I might be able in the future to perceive a difference which I do not perceive now, constitutes now for me a significant aesthetic difference between the two! This may contribute to the development of my ability. >Perception, >Distinctions. III 108/09 When in fact, no difference can be perceived, then the existence of a difference is based alone on something that can be proved (or not) by other means than looking at it. III 120 Def forgery: Goodman: the forgery of a work of art is an object that wrongly pretends to have a history, which is essential for the original.}, note = { G IV N. Goodman Catherine Z. Elgin Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences, Indianapolis 1988 German Edition: Revisionen Frankfurt 1989 Goodman I N. Goodman Ways of Worldmaking, Indianapolis/Cambridge 1978 German Edition: Weisen der Welterzeugung Frankfurt 1984 Goodman II N. Goodman Fact, Fiction and Forecast, New York 1982 German Edition: Tatsache Fiktion Voraussage Frankfurt 1988 Goodman III N. Goodman Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Indianapolis 1976 German Edition: Sprachen der Kunst Frankfurt 1997 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=220699} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=220699} }