@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Avramides,Anita}, subject = {Cartesianism}, note = {I 107 ff Cartesianism/Asymmetry/Avramidis: the Cartesianism is an older tradition of deep epistemic asymmetry. >Terminology/Avramides. Mental objects are only accessible through first-person perspective. >First Person, >Priviledged acces. Other minds are only guessable through behavior. >Other minds. Then there is no superficial epistemic asymmetry. Important argument: ontological symmetry: the mental and the material are on the same level. >Levels/Order. This thesis is ot obliged to physicalism. >Physicalism. Variant of Cartesianism: one might even say the God standpoint could not recognize the intangible substance. Deep epistemic asymmetry/Avramides: if we could recognize the intangible substance, we could recognize foreign intentions without language. Cartesianism/Avramides: here: variant with divine access to the intangible. Cartesianism/Avramides:is not reductive! >Reduction, >Reductionism. I 110 AvramidesVsCartesianism: It is a mistake to proceed without observing behavior. >Behavior, >Understanding.}, note = { Avr I A. Avramides Meaning and Mind Boston 1989 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=209793} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=209793} }